Microsoft has issued a major update to Live Search, and the Live Search Team claims that, compared to the old version, the new one is “relevant, faster and easier to use.” Fair enough, but the question remains: is it more relevant, faster, and easier to use than Google? The answer: no.

Microsoft made a good effort, anyway. The Live Search team identifies the release as “our biggest update since our debut in January 2005,” and the list of upgraded features goes on and on. Some of the highlights include a greatly increased index size, video previews, and an aesthetic redesign.

Microsoft also speaks of “[s]ignificant enhancements to core algorithms,” an “[e]xpansion of Rich Answers,” and - supposedly - “[s]ubstantial improvements in understanding queryintent [sic].”

But here’s where there are some noticeable problems. After entering the word “dog” into Live Search, the number three result shows a paragraph from Wikipedia’s entry concerning digital on-screen graphics. The fourth result is also from Wikipedia, and relates to the dog’s place as a zodiac animal. Google’s top ten results all connect to dogs in the sense of dachshunds, collies, and golden retrievers, which is what I had in mind.

Other tests also showed that Live Search isn’t quite up to snuff. Maybe Microsoft will have better luck next time, though; Elinor Mills reports, “The company plans to release major updates every six months to one year...”

Source: www.webpronews.com